Proof of Insanity in Perry Edward Smith

Dr. Jones, a renowned psychiatrist who has examined the mental health of 25 murderers, is brought in to judge the psyches of Dick and Perry. When Dr. Jones is called upon to make his judgment in court, he is asked “From your conversations and examinations of Mr. Perry Edward Smith, do you have an opinion as to whether he knew right from wrong at the time of the offense involved in this action?” (296) and then answers, “No” (296), and states that he cannot make an accurate judgment about whether or not Perry is mentally ill. The fact that Dr. Jones cannot come to a decision is reflective of the fact that there may be some underlying psychiatric issues in Perry’s mind. Had Perry been completely sane, like Dick, Dr. Jones would have come to a conclusion right away. However, Dr. Jones had seen conflicting evidence in Perry’s letter and behavior, and is unable to finish his evaluation without more testing. As opposed to disregarding Dr. Jones’s opinion, the court should have given him more time to examine Perry, as there is a likely chance that he would have concluded that Perry was suffering from a mental illness and was not sane at the time of the murders.

The development of a mental illness stems from genetics and the environment, and Perry was out of luck in both of those cases. Perry’s father describes his wife as “Her drinkin and stepin out, living with a young man” (126-127). Perry was born with a predisposition to become an alcoholic, as a result of his mother constantly drinking. Additionally, the syntax used by Perry’s father to describe his mother is incorrect, and shows that he was uneducated. His sentences are not complete and the endings to his verbs are incorrect. The lack of education in Perry’s father translates down to Perry as he does not become educated either. Furthermore, Perry’s mother was cheating on his father, a marriage which eventually ended in divorce. After his parents split up, two out of three of his siblings committed suicide, further damaging Perry’s emotions. Suicide is often associated with mental illness, proving even more likely that mental illness runs in the Smith family, and there is a high chance that Perry could become insane.

During Dr. Jones’s evaluation, he claims “In evaluating the intentions and feelings of others, his ability to separate the real situation from his own mental projections is very poor” (297). This is proven to be true as Perry stands over Mr. Clutter, ready to kill. When he is describing this moment, which should have been very powerful and full of rage as is normally during a crime of passion, Perry states, “I didn’t want to harm the man…I thought so right up to the moment that I slit his throat” (302). It is almost as if Perry is not feeling anything, a bizarre description for a person about to commit a brutal murder. The language that Perry uses is simple and clear. The last four words of his sentence come as a shock after the non-emotional diction that Perry uses to describe Mr. Clutter. Slitting someone’s throat is a violent and disgusting act, which comes as a surprise at the end of Perry’s sentence, similar to how the murders he committed were a surprise to Perry. Although he was well aware of Dick’s plan, Perry agreed to follow him into the Clutter household in order to obtain a large sum of money, not to murder a family. Perry seemed shocked when he was the one holding the knife and pulling the trigger instead of Dick.

Merton argues that everyone’s main focus in life is accomplishing goals, and the route that we take to complete these tasks says a lot about our character. Murton claims, “There results a twofold mental conflict insofar as the moral obligation for adopting institutional means conflicts with the pressure to resort to illegitimate means (which may attain the goal)” (677). Capote makes it seem as if Perry never struggled with this conflict, but was eager to resort to illegitimate means to obtain money, his initial goal. Although he was not initially planning to kill the Clutters, they stood in the way of his goal, so he made a split decision to get rid of them. Although Murton argues that there is a moral conflict present when the means are not available to accomplish a goal, only insane people would disregard societal norms in order to do this. In this case, disregarding society is not just voiding social norms, but judicial laws that have very strict consequences when broken. Only someone who was mentally ill, such as Perry, would disregard society in this way, especially for a goal as trivial as some extra money. Although Dr. Jones never officially declared Perry mentally ill, there is enough evidence in the novel to prove that he is such and was insane during the time of the murder.

3 thoughts on “Proof of Insanity in Perry Edward Smith

  1. I agree with your argument and analysis in the first three paragraphs– it certainly seems that given more time to examine Perry, Dr. Jones might have uncovered more information and it might have come to light that Perry had a mental illness that spurred his killing of the Clutters. However, I found your last paragraph a little confusing, in terms of Perry’s goal. It seems you are linking Perry’s goal to monetary gain, but I think that the money was actually Dick’s goal and Perry was just along for the ride. Perry was not intending to kill the Clutters upon entering the property, and even was eager to turn back at numerous points (“There isn’t any safe, so let’s get the hell out of here.'”(239)). The argument “[The Clutters] stood in the way of his goal” would apply well if Dick had ended up being the one that killed them, but as it happened the murder of Herb Clutter was a result of Perry trying to call Dick’s bluff and going too far, and then the other three followed to cover up the first. However, this certainly supports your point that Perry was not totally mentally stable.

    Like

  2. Julia, I understand your confusion and believe that you brought up an interesting point. Although the idea to rob the Clutters was originally Dick’s, Perry went along with the idea and ended up focusing on the monetary gain just as much as Dick. While confessing his story to Dewey, Perry claims, ” I wanted the money as much as he [Dick] did. I wanted to get it and go to Mexico. But I hoped we could do it without violence” (234). This quote explains that money was the incentive for going into the Clutter household, although it did not end up being the outcome. Initially, Perry claimed that he was not planning on killing the Clutters, but ended up doing it in order to avoid being caught. This relates to Merton’s ideas, because Perry is using means that are against the law in order to accomplish his goals.

    Like

  3. Because the novel declared that Kansas law required only a minimal affirmation or denial of the sanity of Perry and Dick, there was no real space to explain the Dr.’s conclusions. Because of this short response to the proposed question, the court was acting upon M’Naghten Rule in which regardless of supposed sanity, the convicted men would be charged with the crime. This being said though, Dr. Jones’s indecision in terms of Perry’s sanity can be traced through his family history as you stated. What I do have to disagree with though, is your statement that his upbringing and immediate family’s fates could be causational for his current criminal behavior. I think his poor upbringing and unfortunate situation caused a predisposition for misbehavior, which in turn became criminal activity. This does not mimic Dick’s situation, which was outlined to be pretty well-off excluding his socioeconomic standing, yet both men ended up as criminals suffering the same fate.
    Also, in speaking about Perry’s life, I found your comment on Perry’s intelligence interesting. I find it ironic that Perry prided himself so much on his grammar and his ability to correct Dick’s sentence formation yet he had barely experienced grammar school. Dick had received much more and a more formal education than Perry had yet Perry seemed to pride himself on correcting Dick and being more intelligent than his partner. At the same time though, Perry envied those who had received a higher education. It is this dichotomy that makes me question Perry’s self esteem. In some situations he appeared to be secure in his position in society but when faced with reality, he found himself envious of those who were “higher” in the social pyramid. In this way, he mimics Dick. The pair of them both desired what others had and they themselves could never attain. What I wonder, though, is: was is this one of the threads that allowed them to maintain such a close relationship? Throughout the novel, each man can be quoted belittling the other and devaluing his life, intelligence, worth, etc. so what was it that kept them tied together the whole time? I feel as if it could possibly be that each man felt superior to the other in a sufficient respect to desire a relationship. This is just one personal thought on the matter, can others think of different potential explanations for why the two remained together instead of splitting up?

    Like

Leave a comment